It’s time to get Ruud, Rafa…
Posted by David Hurst in Rants on January 7th, 2010
It’s January, and that means it’s transfer window time. If you’re a Liverpool fan like me, this is usually a time of sheer frustration and this season is certainly no exception. The club has followed up last season’s excellent showing in the league, with a display of sheer on-pitch ineptitude that one might expect from a lower league team with part time staff, but certainly not from the likes of the overpaid superstars that call Anfield home.
As a club, Liverpool has shown a degree of patience with its managers that is all but non-existent in the English Premier League, and this is a trait that does the club, its staff and its fans much credit. However, enough is enough. I for one am fed up with seeing Rafa spend great flipping wodges of cash on players that he tells us are amazing, and yet completely fail to deliver the goods. I suspect this is largely down to the fact that Mr Benitez seems adamant that the best way to develop his players and team is via a squad rotation system that ensures they don’t get a regular game or any kind of opportunity to settle into anything approaching a rhythm. Often, these players show flashes of brilliance, but no kind of consistency, and then thanks to the ludicrous financial situation, are shown the door and sold on for less than the club paid for them a year previously.
So, having got rid of arguably England’s finest striker in Peter Crouch, and shooing off other goal scorers with proven track records (Robbie Keane and Craig Bellamy), we are left with one striker. Probably the finest striker in the world, but he is just one man. Inexplicably, we passed (again) the opportunity to have Michael Owen back, so now we are in a position where we must sell players in order to have enough money to buy someone new. The squad needs strengthening throughout, and we maybe could have done this had Rafa not gassed over £20million on Aquilani, who has so far managed just 5 outings for the club.
Then, I saw in the rumour mill talk of us getting none other than Ruud van Nistelrooy from Real Madrid. That would have been brilliant! Some would say that at 33 he’s past it, but I’ll have you know the Ruud Boy has stuck in 46 goals in 68 appearances for Real Madrid. It’s a complete no-brainer: Ruud wants first team football for the World Cup, and he won’t get it at Real; we need a cheap striker who knows the Premiership and can hit the ground running. But, no, it doesn’t look like it will happen. Instead, by all accounts, we now have Maxi Rodriguez on his way over who has a rather less impressive record of 32 goals in 121 appearances for Atletico Madrid, and no Premiership experience. He’s 29, played most of his career in Spain, and in all probability won’t adapt to the Premiership even in the unlikely event that Rafa actually gives him a regular run out.
What’s even more sad is that unless we get a big offer for a player, our January signings will be just Maxi and possibly one other loan signing (and that won’t be Ruud).
I really hope I’m proven wrong, but I doubt it. If Liverpool don’t muster a top 4 finish this season, then Rafa must go. If we don’t win the league next year, then Rafa must go. He’s had his chance and spent vast amounts of money bringing in player after player, and with a few exceptions, most of them haven’t worked. How much more time and money do we give this guy?
I say give the job to Ian Rush.
And for those interested, here are a few of Rafa’s Kop Flops:
Josemi - £2m - 16 starts in 18 months
Antonio Nunez - part of the Michael Owen deal, and easy to see why Real wanted rid of him
Fernando Morientes - £6.3m - formerly brilliant, but a short spell playing for Rafa soon cocked that up
Jan Kromkamp - lasted half a season before scarpering back to the Netherlands
Mark Gonzalez - £4.5m - spent a year on loan just to get a work permit and was gone after one season
Craig Bellamy - £6m - actually scored better than 1 in 3, but he also fell by the wayside
Ryan Babel - £11.5m - showed some signs of promise, and probably just needs regular football, but by all accounts he will be shown the door this month
Jermaine Pennant - £6.7m - not good enough for Arsenal, and not good enough for us, despite some flashes of brilliance
Robbie Keane - £20.3 - came to play for Rafa and wrecked his career, didn’t get nearly enough action to stand a chance of surviving longer than the 6 months he did, before being sold for a massive loss
Gabriel Paletta - £2m - useless defender that made only 3 appearances
Andrea Dossena - £7m - now our 3rd choice left back, great value, not
There are more, but I’m just too depressed to carry on…
More tax please Darling…
Posted by David Hurst in Rants on December 10th, 2009
I bet that’s just what everyone was thinking before the pre-budget report. I mean, it was only last year we had a hike in National Insurance, and now there’s a bit more to pay. Super. It’s not as if we pay much tax already is it…
It may only be a tenner a month, but that’s cutting right into my pocket money. That means I will be spending proportionally less at the model shop and at the local eateries. That in turn has an impact on those small businesses, who themselves are struggling with taxes. This results in price increases, and so the vicious cycle goes.
Oh, and whilst you’re at it, why not tax our broadband connections too? Now I understand why you were so keen to get everyone in the country connected.
This country sucks ass.
Taunton Town Centre Pop-Up Urinal (”Urilift”)
Posted by David Hurst in Rants on December 7th, 2009
It’s probably been a couple of years since I first came across the pop-up urinal in the centre of Taunton. We had taken the staff out for a company night out and came face to face with a Urilift at the bottom of the High Street. I had no idea what it was, in fact at first I thought it was some sort of water fountain. It was only when I got my face closer I realised it was a urinal - wide open for everyone to see. Then, a few days later, I was stood at the same spot on the High Street and the thing had vanished. I then saw the circular shape on the paving and it dawned on me that it was a urinal that pops up out of the ground at night.
I was driving back from Minehead on Saturday night and cut across the town, and saw the urinal again, this time being used by a couple of drunk chaps, whilst a whole load of young ladies (wearing virtually nothing) walked nonchalantly by. I’m in my early thirties and I’m not a complete prude, but it astonishes me just how much times have changed since I frequented the town centre on a Saturday night, and this urinal just sums it all up.
We are a nation in moral decay. Where is the sense of decency? Why do we need to install open urinals in busy High Streets? I understand the council is trying to stop drunk revellers from slipping into a dark alley to do their business, which the following day smells awful for the shoppers, but by placing a urinal in a wide open space, they are simply condoning or even encouraging this sort of behaviour.
I wonder how effective the pop-up urinal is anyway. It seems to cater only for men, and yet there are equal numbers of drunk female louts staggering about the streets of Taunton. Are we expected to believe that the female of the species is never caught short during a night on the razz? Are we also expected to believe that chaps would prefer standing in the middle of the High Street to a secluded dark alley?
What bothers me most is that during the summer the urinal pops up during the daylight. Worse still, someone could be using it in the daylight while I drive past with my children. It is, after all, positioned right smack bang in the middle of Taunton town centre.

Three wise men? Three kings? Who were these chaps?
Posted by David Hurst in Religious Musings on December 4th, 2009
In the second of my mini series of short blogs about Christmas, I’m looking at the common misunderstanding of the “wise men” or “kings” that you see portrayed in every school nativity around the country.
Who or what were they?
This part of the story of the birth of Christ is found in Matthew 2:1, which in the KJV talks about “wise men” coming from the east. Other translations render the verse as “kings”. More accurate translations render the verse as “astrologers”, because indeed these men were Magi. The phrase is a Latinisation of the Greek word “magos”, which generally referred to priests of zoroastrianism, who were known for star worship and astrology.
How many where there?
The scripture doesn’t say. Commonly, people believe there were three of them because of there supposedly being three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. However there could have been other gifts, and the quantity of each gift is not stated, so there could have been two or more Magi. We don’t know the exact number.
Peace on Earth and good will to all men
Posted by David Hurst in Religious Musings on December 3rd, 2009
With Christmas 2009 rapidly approaching, I thought I might do a series of short posts on the various biblical inaccuracies that seem to spout forth over the festive period. This one is a classic: “peace on Earth and good will to all men”. How many times have you heard that?
It comes from Luke 2:14, which the King James Version (as per usual) mis-translates into the saying above. The early Latin texts render it: “et in terra pax hominibus, bonae voluntatis”. So, a more accurate translation would be: “peace on Earth to men of good will”. And that changes the meaning completely.
