Category Archives: Motorcycling

My invisible new motorcycle boots

I need new motorcycle boots. The pair of TCX boots I bought are falling apart after six months. Yes, you read that right: SIX MONTHS! A letter is winging its way to TCX as I type.

I decided to head up to George White’s outlet store in Swindon, tieing in the trip with a visit (and ride-out) with a chum who lives up there. We rolled up at 5.20 on Saturday only to find they shut at 5! What a bunch of slack part-timers! 5pm on a Saturday?? I guess I should have checked the website before I left, but frankly it never even occurred to me that any large store would shut that early on a Saturday.

I can’t be arsed to ride all the way up there again – there are no decent routes to take on a bike from Ilminster to Swindon – so I guess it will be another trip to Hein Gericke tomorrow.

[UPDATE: Just had a response from TCX who are replacing my boots! What extraordinarily good customer service. Now I have complete confidence in the brand.]

Suzuki TL1000S review

Well, I’ve been motorcycle shopping again, and this time have come home with a Suzuki TL1000S. Mine is green with the fairing lowers and a pair of Blueflame titanium cans, sans baffles. This thing sounds like Armageddon coming down the road. :-)

It has been said, quite famously, that “novices should skip the TL1000S and proceed directly to the morgue”. Indeed, it is a bit of a handful. I’m a couple of months in to my TL experience, but after my first couple of rides I was searching for a good way to describe it to a friend. I came up with:

“Riding a TL1000S is a bit like trying to sit on the back of an angry tiger, after kicking it in the nuts and spraying it in the face with mace.”

The TL1000S has a reputation as a bit of a widow maker due largely to the inadequate rear shock which is an unusual rotary damper design. This leaves the bike a bit wanting when the cornering gets hard, with the possibility of high siding somewhat higher than other bikes. Additionally, after quite a few customers had complained about being dead, Suzuki did a recall and retro-fitted steering dampers to all bikes. You need to take the horror stories with a pinch of salt. Whilst Suzuki admit they didn’t do as much road testing as usual, the fact is the bike is not a death trap. Everything is relative. If you ride a bike like this at the limit on public roads, then frankly you will probably also end up with a nasty case of death. But, if you ride more sensibly, this is a very capable bike.

Once you have dialed in appropriate suspension settings, you can start to appreciate the light chassis and unbelievable motor. V-Twins are always powerful, but this engine really is the nuts! 996CC and a shade under 130BHP at the crank, with enough torque to adjust the Earth’s rotation if you’re a bit hasty off the line! Lighter riders with hamfisted throttle hands will find it lifting the front wheel with very little encouragement. Personally, I like to short-shift and ride the torque wave. Even with restraint, you find yourself hitting license losing speeds within a few seconds. Overtaking is a breeze in any gear!

Ride it smoothly and get your lines right and the TL1000S delivers a rewarding and involving ride.

The downsides are the cost of consumables and lack of anything approaching fuel economy. 100 miles is all you get before the fuel light comes on. Mine had a barely used Bridgestone BT014 rear tyre on when I bought it. Less than 1000 miles on and I’ve had to replace it! Massive torque plus soft compound tyres equals regular trips to the tyre shop! I’ve just fitted an Avon Storm ST to the rear, which should give adequate grip and a much longer life – I’ll report back on that, but I covered 300 miles on Saturday and it was just fine. One thing I have noticed is that the bike previously had a 180/55 tyre on, but it should be 190/50. When I replaced it, I got the correct size, but as this wider, the turn-in is slightly slower than it was with the narrower tyre. Still, with some positive counter steering input, the bike handles very well through the twisties.

The riding position is not quite as harsh as a supersport, but it’s far from comfortable on long journeys if you’re doing less than 60mph. It’s pretty good for bottom comfort, but it’s hard on the hands, particularly with the heavy clutch that will need to be slipped a lot below 30mph. The engine is really not comfortable below 3,000 rpm, so it can be a bit of a challenge to ride through town, but this is no commuter – it’s a bike for the open road.

I bought the bike from a friend, who raised an eyebrow at my purchasing such a machine just 10 months into my biking career. Personally, I think I am a good rider and I can manage the power perfectly well. I have plenty of self control, and whilst I do make quick progress on the road, I do not smash into corners hard on the brakes trailing my knee – if that’s your sort of riding style, you will want a different bike. I’m not sure I would recommend the bike to those with little experience, unless like me you know you can exercise self control and are not so cocksure that you’re not aware of your own riding faults and problem areas. The first time you get on the power out of a bend is a little bit sphincter loosening as the bike has a tendency to shimmy a little under the power.

I bought the TL as a second bike and it is the perfect antidote to my FZ6 Fazer. The two machines are completely different and I love that. I’m not sure I would want to live with the TL as my only machine, considering that much of my riding is the daily commute, but as a fun bike it certainly ticks the right boxes.

If you are looking for something a bit different, the TL1000S could be an option for you. Good examples with reasonable mileage can be had for £2000. The grin will be spread wide across your face!

Additionally, there are some excellent forums for TL owners, the best of which is www.tlzone.net. Enjoy!

Lowering the speed limits causes congestion and pollution

I see that there are proposals being  announced by the government to further reduce speed limits – from 30mph to 20mph in urban locations, and 60mph to 50mph in the countryside. Apparently this is all part of a new strategy to reduce road deaths in Britain by 33% by 2020.

So, the government is still flying in the face of voters’ opinion and the clear facts, and sticking to their ludicrous “speed kills” mantra. Never mind that only 5% of accidents are put down to excessive speed. Forget the fact that before 1992 when the government starting lowering speed limits and banging up speed cameras everywhere, the road deaths total in Britain was falling, and since then it has risen. No, why let facts get in the way? If they drop the speed limit, they can clog up the roads during the day, and catch innocent motorists on their speed cameras at night.

Who is in charge of creating these policies? Have they actually done the math? Let’s examine a simple example shall we…?

We have a stretch of road, 1 mile in length, with a 30mph limit – a perfectly sensible limit for an urban area. Let’s assume that during rush hour, 2400 cars travel this 1 mile stretch every hour. That averages out to 40 cars per minute joining the road and 40 cars per minute leaving the road. Each car takes 2 minutes to complete the mile, so at any time there can be 80 cars on the road. Now 1 mile equals 1609 metres, and the average car length is about 2.5 metres. Assuming that each car keeps a safe distance of 5 car lengths from the vehicle in front, then each car needs 15 metres of road space. If there are 80 cars on the road, that’s 1200 metres. Easily do-able on our road.

Now, in comes an idiot bureaucrat, and drops the speed limit to 20mph, for reasons of “road safety” and reducing road deaths.

As a result, each car will now take 3 minutes to complete the mile, so at any time, there can be 120 cars on the road, which if keeping a safe distance would need 1800 metres of space. Oh dear. We only have 1609 metres available. Something has to give, and that something is the safe distance from the car in front. Now, pop quiz: will this reduce accidents or increase accidents? One thing it will do is allow less reaction time for each driver, and because not all drivers are equal there will inevitably be some late braking. Late braking has a knock on effect in heavy traffic, thus creating congestion and traffic jams, meaning the cars can’t even do the 20mph speed limit. Regardless of this, there are still 40 cars per minute trying to join the road. If there aren’t 40 leaving at the other end, everything grinds to a halt, and now you have thousands of cars sat idle with engines running going nowhere. So, up go the pollution levels, and in summer, up goes the heat. So on goes the air conditioning in the cars, and even more crap belching out of thousands of exhaust pipes all on a one mile stretch of road in a confined urban area.

This example is obviously greatly simplified, because you just can’t bundle road traffic scenarios into nice mathematical formulae any more than you can impose an arbitrary speed limit of 20mph and expect it to work. In reality, chaos theory is in evidence. Some people are late. Some people speed. Some people drive too close. There may be cyclists that cars have to queue to pass.

Also, in our example above, all the traffic is cars. What about vans and lorries?

Being a keen biker, I would note at this point, that the motorcycles would still be able to get through the traffic, using less fuel, less roadspace and generally being much greener. Of course, the bureaucrats aren’t happy with common sense solutions, oh no, they would rather just legislate motorcyles off the road.

In this week’s budget, Alistair Darling announced plans on cutting carbon emissions. How exactly this nonsense will help is beyond me.

Britain’s industry has gone to the dogs due to being taxed out of existence. Hauliers can’t compete with European counterparts due to the excessive tax burden on petrol (which is yet again being increased). Soon, Britains roads will grind to a halt and all business will die. When are people finally going to stand up and protest this rubbish. Is anyone out there still under the illusion that we have a democracy???

As regards reducing road deaths, how is changing a 30 to a 20 or a 60 to a 50 going to make any tangible difference? Are they thinking about pedestrian road deaths? When I was a kid we had the green cross code, and we knew exactly what would happen if we stepped in front of a moving car. Once I was riding my bicycle and didn’t see an approaching car, and rode straight into the front of it. As I recall, we paid for the broken headlight, and I got punished for being so stupid. Nowadays, it’s always the driver at fault and if he dares to object, then he will be sued.

What a pile of crap – and we the British public are expected to live in it. Like pigs.

Triumph Daytona 675 for sale in Wiltshire, UK

My good friend Mike is selling his showroom condition Triumph Daytona 675. His is the ‘Masterbike’ Limited Edition – number 78 out of only 100 built.

If you are looking for a used Triumph Daytona 675, you won’t find better than this one. I can personally vouch for its authenticity and the fact it is completely mint. Looks fabulous (lots of original Triumph carbon fibre goodies), sounds glorious – this a rare opportunity to buy one of these bikes. The 675 is widely recognised as the finest middleweight sports, and justly so.

www.triumphdaytona4sale.co.uk – loads of high resolution images and video, so check it out for yourself. Do Mike a favour and buy this, then he can go get the GSX1000R he’s after!

Robert Bennett – jailed for 6 months for riding at 122MPH

I feel the need to add my voice to the growing number who are appalled by the sentence handed out to Robert Bennett for his motorcycle speeding offence.

For those not familiar with the story…

Mr Bennett was allegedly caught speeding at 122MPH in the rain on the A361 in North Devon. He was riding a Suzuki Hayabusa and had his 14 year old son riding pillion. As a result, Robert Bennett received an 18 month driving ban and a 6 month custodial jail sentence, of which he must serve at least 3 months. His life is, I’m sure, ruined.

First of all, far be it from me or any other road user to criticise Mr Bennett for speeding. All drivers do it, whether intentionally or not. Obviously, few drivers hoon about at 122MPH, but let’s put this into context: the Suzuki Hayabusa is a 1300CC sports motorcycle capable of 186MPH, therefore 122MPH represents 65% of its capability. I regularly see people driving ordinary family cars at 100MPH+ on the motorway, which represents closer to 90% of the vehicle’s capability. Whilst I am certainly not going to condone riding at 122MPH on a public highway, that speed is well within the safe operational design limits of the bike in question. Mr Bennett has decades of riding experience, so it’s probably safe to say that he was operating within his own limits too

I’m not going to make a judgement on the speed – make your own mind up about that. Police pursuit drivers happily exceed those speeds in inferior vehicles without any concern for public safety. Also worth bearing in mind that a Hayabusa can stop from 122MPH in less distance than most cars can pull up from 70MPH. Frankly, if you watch the video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVOyrFz5pbk) I would question the accuracy of the speed gun anyway. He certainly doesn’t seem to be going that fast, particularly as he goes round the corner barely leaning.

Of course, he was prosecuted for dangerous driving not speeding, but I can’t really see much dangerous in the way he was riding. Sure, there was potential for a nasty accident, but he didn’t have one did he?

Very very harsh.

Let’s not forget that Lord Ahmed (a Labour peer) was jailed for only 12 weeks after texting behind the wheel and actually killing someone! He only served 16 days of that sentence. Where is the parity in justice?

In any case, if you ride that quickly, you greatly increase your risk and the need to concentrate and fully focus on the job. I cannot comprehend attempting that with a pillion, particularly if the pillion was my own son. My boys are not old or big enough to go on the back of my bikes, but when they are I will gladly take them. However, I will be riding more slowly and more carefully than I would on my own, and my boys would have to be decked out top to toe in safety gear. Mr Bennett failed to even provide gloves for his son.

Since being caught Robert Bennett has taken an anti-bike stance. He said:

“That bike was just so fast. You only have to touch the throttle and boom, it’s gone. I never would have knowingly traveled at that speed, especially with my son on the back. These bikes react amazingly quickly and sometimes it’s very hard to tell just how fast you are going.

“When I realised what I had done I felt very ashamed and had to get rid of the bike as soon as possible – I didn’t want it to happen again. With hindsight, I don’t know why manufacturers make bikes that fast, they should be speed-restricted, I will never buy a bike that fast again, in fact, I think I’ll stick to my car in future.”

Give me a break! No-one buys a Suzuki Hayabusa for its looks! People buy them because it’s the fastest bike you can buy. As with all modern bikes, the ‘busa comes complete with a speedo. This amazing gadget can be used to tell you just how fast you are going… and, it also comes with a throttle that can be closed as well as opened. If you can’t control a throttle, don’t buy a Hayabusa.

Frankly, I can’t believe anyone with 30 years’ riding experience would not have excellent throttle control along with a thoroughly good grasp of speed – without even having to look at the speedo. I have mastered both of those things, and I have been riding for just 1 year. So, why come out with all this tosh? The anti-motorcycling nazis are already against him, why does he want to alienate the motorcycling community with nonsense statements like this?

I think the quick sale probably had more to do with the certain knowledge of a ban and wanting to get the best price possible for the machine. Frankly, with the celebrity value, he should have been able to get rid of it for better than market value anyway.

As stupid as this was (and let’s face it, who of us hasn’t done stupid things in our life that are totally out of character with our normal good judgement?), does the punishment fit the crime?

Hell no! It’s an outrage! There is no way a car driver caught at 122MPH would receive a jail sentence like this. Again, I refer to Lord Ahmed’s case as a classic example. This is nothing more than bigotry on the part of Judge Phillip Wassall, who when sentencing came out with this:

“Had you lost control of your motorcycle it would have become a missile, causing a serious accident and probably the death of at least one person.”

What?!

The chances of an experienced rider losing control of a motorcycle operating well within its limits on a smooth dual carriageway is unlikely to say the least! And how would it have become a missile exactly? Missiles take off and accelerate towards a specific target. A bike sliding down the road is slowing down, and is simply out of control – not at all like a missile. Frankly, the dangers of a bike sliding down the road are similar whether the bike was doing 122MPH or 70MPH.

How do we know it would have caused a serious accident? A properly dressed motorcyclist can walk away from a 122MPH slide down the road. It’s all down to traffic, weather, road surface, chaos theory and a billion other random influences.

“Probably the death of at least one person”. Well, that sounds scientific and factual. Fair enough, the kid is going to have some messed up hands coming off at that speed without gloves, but he may not necessarily be dead. This is nothing more than conjecture, and conjecture has no place in the convicting of a person.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to justify the crime. I think it was completely reckless, but my opinion is no more relevant than Phillip Wassall’s own bigoted anti-bike, anti-justice ideals.

Robert Bennett needs to appeal. He is being made an example off, and that is not justice. I have no doubt he would win an appeal against the custodial sentence, but when he does, I suggest he leaves the bikes to those of us who know how to use a throttle and a speedo.

Bikes are a sensible, safe, cheap and environmentally friendly form of transport. Just as with cars, there are a small minority who drive like complete pricks and spoil it for the rest of us. I hope that the majority of safe riders will not be affected adversely by this case.

Foglights are for FOG!

I get so sick of being blinded by idiot car drivers who insist on having both their headlights and their front foglights burning in broad daylight. I’m at a loss to explain why they do it. I have foglights on the front of my car and I don’t feel an overwhelming urge to break the law and switch them on in the daylight. Perhaps some drivers think it looks “cool” in some way? I mean, it’s not as though they get any benefit from having them on, and it’s not as though they can actually see the front of their car whilst they sit behind the wheel.

Frankly, this sort of behaviour is typical of many car drivers, who glide around at high speed in their tonne+ metal cages, completely oblivious to their surroundings and other road users. Riding a motorcycle, as I do, makes you a much better car driver. It teaches you to actually connect with the job at hand, focus on being safe and avoid the morons around you. I think every driver should have to spend at least 6 months on a bike before they can have a car license.

This morning there was thick fog to be contended with on the way to work. I decided to ride my bike, but made sure I prepared. Cleaned my headlight glass, used high beam when appropriate (which being diffused through the fog would not dazzle other road users) and wore a high visibility vest.

Adequately prepared, I set off and gazed in astonishment as car after car passed me with NO headlights on at all. Some had sidelights on which are about as useful as fog as holding a torch out of the window might be. In all the cars I passed on my 17 mile run on busy dual carriageway, 3 had foglights on. Do car drivers not realise that they cannot be seen in fog if they don’t turn their lights on?

This is the problem. A motorcyclist is conscious not only of being able to see the road ahead, but also of being seen by other road users. Many car drivers only give thought to being able to see the road ahead, and some aren’t much bothered with that either.

Keep your wits about you if you want to stay alive out there.

Bennetts Motorcyle Insurance – bleeding me dry

I think I made a mistake in choosing Bennetts to insure my motorcycles. Whilst their premium initially seemed low, I am now paying for that in spades with their incessant £25 “admin” charge. Every time I make a change to my policy, no matter how minor, they bang on £25.

Today I phoned to change my address and update the details of how the bike is stored, and guess what? Yep. Another £25 please. And here’s the real scam: if you pay by monthly installments, the only way you can pay the £25 is by adding it to your direct debit, which means you get charged interest on the admin fee too!!!

And how is it that there is no refund in premium due to the fact the bike is now parked in a secure garage as opposed to being left on the street?

No other insurance company has ever charged me for a change of address, unless the new address impacted the premium. Bennetts, you are a complete joke – you may have my £25 (plus interest), but you have lost my business. When renewal time comes I shall be deserting you like the proverbial sinking ship.

Motorcycling in Winter – how to stay warm and dry

As the weather has taken a turn for the worse, I have found myself having to adapt my riding to suit the new conditions. I think I’ve found solutions to the majority of problems facing motorcyclists in bad weather, so I thought I’d list them here. Let’s start with dealing with the cold.

Staying Warm

When your body is cold, your reaction times are increased and your concentration levels are decreased. This is not a good combination for a motorcyclist! This can be particularly problematic as far as your hands are concerned. Cold hands are not only painful, they’re also slow, numb and clumsy, all of which could contribute to your failing to be able to make quick adjustments to the controls to avoid dangerous situations. The best solution to this problem is:

Heated Grips
Heated grips not only keep your hands warm, they also warm the blood that is circulating through your hands, which in turn helps keep your upper body warm. Whilst original manufacturer heated grips are quite pricey, other manufacturers such as Oxford sell grips suitable for all bikes from about £50. That’s less than you’d pay for a good set of winter gloves! The difference heated grips make to winter riding is phenomenal. You can ride for longer, and in comfort, despite very low temperatures.

Regardless of whether or not you choose to install heated grips, it’s essential to have good:

Gloves
Invest in a good quality pair of leather winter gloves, and you will be rewarded. Winter gloves, unlike their more flimsy summer counterparts, should be airtight. This ensures that your hands stay warm for as long as possible (which in cold weather, still won’t be very long). Make sure the gloves are waterproof as wet gloves will make your hands colder much more quickly. Gloves needn’t be expensive. I bought a very good pair made by Lewis for just £30.

To extend the warm time, consider some:

Inner Gloves
These are thin gloves that you wear under your main motorcycling gloves. You need to make sure that they don’t restrict your movement of course, but wearing an inner pair of gloves will keep your hands warmer for longer. Again, they needn’t be expensive. A simple knitted pair cost me just £3 and are barely noticeable under my main gloves.

Just as your hands need to stay warm, so do your feet. It’s important that you have good:

Boots and Thermal Socks
Feet tend to stay warmer for longer anyway when motorcycling. Partly due to the proximity of the engine, and partly due to the fairing (if you have one). You can keep them much warmer by buying a good pair of thermal socks. You don’t necessarily have to buy motorcycle socks, which tend to be expensive, consider offerings for hikers, mountaineers, snowboarders etc. Often, you can find good quality thermal socks at bargain basement prices from outdoor pursuits outlet stores.

When choosing your boots, buy the best you can afford, but don’t necessarily assume the best is the most expensive. I have some £30 ProBiker boots that are both warmer and dryer than my £100 TCX pair. The only annoyance is the laces on the cheaper pair, but an extra minute putting them on is worth it for the extra weather proofing.

Now, it’s important to keep your legs warm too. Don’t be scared, buy some:

Long Thermal Underwear
“Long Johns” or full-length thermal underwear may make you feel like a bit of a prat at the sales counter of the store you buy them from, but this is soon forgotten when you are enjoying a ride in cold weather without having cold legs and knees. I got a pair made from Merino Wool from Marks & Spencer for £17. There are cheaper versions made from synthetic fibres, but these will never be as comfortable and warm as natural fibres. I wear mine over my normal underwear so that they don’t need washing every day. Worth every penny!

If you have a good pair of textile motorcycling jeans with a thermal lining, the combination of thermal underwear, lining and waterproof outer is more than enough to keep you comfortably warm even in very cold weather.

Moving up the body, don’t forget some:

Thermal Vests or T-Shirts
Again, these can be quite pricey, but you needn’t spend a fortune. All the supermarkets sell vests, and cheap outdoor pursuits stores will have full sleeve thermal t-shirts for reasonable prices. Keeping your upper body warm in cold weather motorcycling is hugely important. Once your core body gets cold, you will have no choice but to stop and warm up somewhere.

Bizarrely, big thick jumpers are not the ticket here. Think layers. Lots of layers. Vest or thermal t-shirt, plus a t-shirt, plus a thin pullover or sweatshirt worn under a good jacket with thermal lining will keep the cold at bay for ages. Remember, it’s easy to remove a layer if you get too warm, but it’s not so easy to find an extra layer whilst on the move if you get too cold.

Here’s another top tip: if you’re out riding and you find that you haven’t layered up properly and the cold is getting in, go buy a newspaper and stuff this under your jacket. The 40p thermal top!

And don’t forget your neck and head! Consider purchasing a:

Balaclava
I buy Spada Chill Factor balaclavas which are made for motorcyclists and have an extra long front to make sure your neck stays covered. A cold neck and chin can be very uncomfortable. You can find these balaclavas on eBay (brand new) for under a tenner. Worth every penny. Just remember that if your helmet is a very tight fit, wear a balaclava might be difficult. For me, it’s a comfortable addition which makes a huge difference. My ears and neck stay warm, and with the balaclava covering my nose, it helps my visor stay fog free for longer.

Staying Dry

Cold is a problem that is easily dealt with. Staying dry can be much more difficult and will exacerbate the cold, so let’s look at what we can do to stay dry. Let’s start again with:

Gloves
Good winter gloves should be waterproof. My £30 pair of Lewis gloves keep my hands bone dry even in torrential rain. Look carefully at the label of the gloves you are buying, and try to find gloves that won’t get soaked themselves. Even though your hands may be dry, if the outer glove is soaked it will catch more wind and you will be colder as a result. Leather does soak up water over time, but textiles offer less protection. You have to find the balance between the two. Again, inner gloves can help, particularly if they are waterproof too, as some motorcycling specific inner gloves are.

Remember: when it’s raining, make sure your glove cuffs are inside the sleeve of your jacket, not outside. If you put your gloves on over your jacket sleeve the water will run down your arms and straight into your gloves, which rather defeats the object!

At the other end of the body, let’s look again at:

Boots
Not all boots are waterproof. Some will survive a light shower, but sustained riding at speed in heavy rain is a different matter entirely. Fabric parts on the top of the boot may make movement easier, but these tend to be weak areas for letting in water. My cheaper textile boots are much more waterproof than my more expensive leather ones, but again they offer less protection.

The cheapest way to waterproof any pair of boots is the humble plastic bag. Pop your feet inside a bag before putting your boots on and you should stay dry no matter what the weather does! Don’t forget also to make sure your trousers go over the top of your boots, otherwise the water will run straight down your legs into the boots!

What you really need is a:

Good Textile Suit
Leather is no good in the rain, you need to wear textiles or a waterproof oversuit. In fact, even if your riding gear is waterproof, a one piece oversuit will ensure you stay dry no matter what, and they’re cheap too!

If you wear a two piece textile combination, remember that as you are sat on the bike, the wind will force the water into your lap, where it will pool and blow up inside your jacket. Ever had the big wet patch on your stomach? That’s the reason. A waterproof oversuit will solve this, but if you don’t have one, take regular opportunities to stand and shake the water clear. Again, the humble plastic bag can come to your rescue: stuff one in the top of your trousers and over your stomach…

Vision

Finally, the other major problem (and I do mean major) is that of visibility. Your helmet does not have a wiper blade, obviously, and constant wiping with gloves will make them wet and make your hands cold. Some gloves have a rubber strip built into the forefinger of the glove to help you wipe clear, but as the visor will be covered with rain again in mere seconds, these are of limited use. Consider some treatment spray for your visor. Once applied, these waxy substances encourage the water to dissipate, and the wind force will be able to push the droplets to the side of the visor.

When it’s wet, the problem of internal fogging becomes much worse. Pinlock inserts, if your helmet supports them, can help hugely here, but otherwise you need to regularly treat the inside of your visor with an anti-fog solution. You can also consider a helmet insert that re-directs your breath away from the visor. All of these things can be purchased in stores like Hein Gericke.

There’s nothing worse than riding at night in the rain with a rapidly fogging visor and rain covering the outside of the visor, deflecting all the light from oncoming traffic. Visibility can be significantly reduced, so ride more slowly. Don’t take risks! Try and follow (at a safe distance) a car, as the red tail lights will help you to see where you are going. If it gets too bad, stop!

Remember too that winter brings lower light conditions and reduced visibility for ALL motorists. Wear a high-visibility vest with reflective material to ensure that they can see you, and obviously make sure you always ride with your lights on.

Winter riding is nothing to be scared of, provided you are properly prepared for it. Don’t expect to be able to ride the way you do in summer, but don’t be too scared of the conditions. Modern tyres grip well even in wet conditions, and a well-maintained bike can be ridden safely and in comfort throughout winter by the well-prepared motorcyclist.

Safe riding folks!

Heated grips – how good are they?

The answer is: good. Very good.

I’ve just had genuine Yamaha heated grips installed on my FZ6 Fazer, and it has revolutionised my winter riding. The genuine Yamaha grips seem to cost considerably more than generic grips made by people like Oxford, but Bransons in Yeovil did me a deal because I had bought my bike from them, and I figure the genuine article will have proper fixings etc. and won’t invalidate any warranties.

The installation is very tidy, and the grips are operated by a simple dial. You can choose anything from gently warming to burning hot, or you can switch them off all together.  The grips are slightly thicker than standard grips, but I find them more comfortable as a result.

The cost was £250 fitted, and I can highly recommend them.

Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2 vs Suzuki SV650S

Regular readers of my blog will know that I started my motorcycle riding career on a Suzuki SV650S. The SV didn’t suit me, largely because the riding position was too sporty and uncomfortable (I’m 6ft1 tall) for any major distances, plus the mileage was getting up to the 27,000 mark. So, I’ve traded it in for a new Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2 with ABS, and having lived with the Fazer for a few days, thought it might be worth doing a quick comparison between the two bikes, particularly as they are similar and are aimed at the same target market.

2008 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2

I should make it clear that my SV650S was a 2001 model with plenty of mileage on it, whereas I’m comparing it with a brand new bike. It’s also worth pointing out that it is only the faired version of the SV (the SV650S as opposed to the SV650) that has the sportier riding position. The naked SV probably would have suited me fine.

The riding position on the Fazer is completely different. You sit very upright, and the bike feels quite tall, which leads to almost motocross style flickability, and possibly a less involved ride than the SV and other more sporty bikes. The seats on both bikes are hard on the buttocks over longer distances, but the Fazer is far more bearable due to the more upright riding position.

Another key difference between the two bikes is the engines. The SV is a v-twin, whereas the Fazer is an inline 4 cylinder, and both have different characteristics. V-twins typically have lower redlines, and generate their peak power earlier in the rev range. They also return excellent levels of torque, meaning you can get away with being more lazy on your gear changes. An inline 4 usually develops less torque and reaches peak power much later in the rev range, meaning you have to make the most of the gears, and rev the engine a bit more to realise the full performance of the engine.

The Fazer has a 600cc engine developing 98BHP @ 12,000 RPM. The SV650S (2001) has a 645cc engine developing 70BHP @ 9,000 RPM. So, which is quicker?

2001 Suzuki SV650S

I think the SV is easier to ride more quickly, with an instant surge of power from the throttle at almost any gear and rev combination. The Fazer feels weaker around town, but when you open it up (7000RPM+) it takes off with a huge surge of power. If you had a drag race, the SV would probably pull off the line quicker, but the Fazer would catch up and win as soon as it hit the magic power band! In every day use, there really isn’t as much difference as you might expect.

Pillion comfort is good on both bikes, but the SV seems to pull better two-up than the Fazer. Grab rails are good on both bikes, with the handle at the rear on the SV and handles on the side of the Fazer. Because the exhausts run under the seat on the Fazer, the pillion does benefit from warm hands and bum too!

Both bikes have a half or bikini fairing with a screen, so how is the wind deflection? Simple answer: the SV is better. At least for me, anyway. I have purchased and started using ear plugs with the Fazer, when I never felt I needed them on the SV. Wind noise is high above 70MPH, and any speed above 90 is pretty untolerable, which is probably a good thing. It’s worth mentioning also that the SV’s mirrors seemed to suffer less from vibration at high speed.

The only real disappointment with the new Yamaha though, is its gearbox. Suzuki just seem to be able to make better gearboxes. Changing gear on my 15 year old GSX1100F is like a knife through hot butter. The Yamaha gearbox is fine until you miss your change downs at a junction. At which point you have to stand on the pedal and engage the clutch slowly until it snaps in, and then repeat until you hit first (pulling away in second is much harder than on the SV due to less torque), which takes time. Simple answer is to make sure you don’t get caught out, but we all have our off-days, and the Suzuki gearbox just seems to be more forgiving. Perversely, the Yamaha gearbox is perfect for clutchless up-changes when on the power – it snicks in very easily, despite the user manual advising you that you should always use the clutch because the engine and drivetrain is not designed to withstand the shock of clutchless changes. Knackers to that. The differences could of course be due to my comparing older bikes with a brand new one.

The only other mild irritation is that only one of the headlights switches on at low beam. I’ve found a guy on the FZ6 Forum who makes up cables to wire up the other headlight though, so I will shortly be making that modification.

In terms of handling, both bikes are exceptionally good and can be flicked around the twisty roads with very little rider input. The Fazer feels like it drops into corners faster (probably due to the tall riding position), but it does hold lines very well.

The brakes are brilliant on both bikes. I spent extra on the Fazer to have ABS, but thankfully I haven’t had cause to use it yet, and I hope I never do, but it seemed like a worthy thing to have for the sake of £300. It will no doubt pay dividends if I ever have to do an emergency stop in the wet with a pillion.

Suzuki are often slated for their finish quality, and the SV is no exception. I use my bikes in all weathers, and the SV which I only had for 4 months, was showing signs of deterioration. Previously, it had been garaged all its life, so the speed with which the rust and oxidisation appeared was a little alarming, and another factor in selling the bike. The Fazer has a painted engine, and the quality of finish looks generally better, so I have a bit more confidence in its weather proofing. Only time will tell. I was disappointed with the thickness of the paint and lacquer though. I foolishly didn’t go straight out to buy a tank protector, and somehow managed to scratch the tank with just the plastic buttons on my jacket. Pretty poor that.

So, which is the better bike?

It’s not that simple. It depends what you want from your ride and how you will use the bike. I would choose the Yamaha every time, purely for the riding position and the generally better quality of finish. The engine (a second generation R6 engine) is good when it gets going, and the sound it makes as you get to the top of the rev range is awesome. Very addictive too, which is not so good given that the top of the rev range in second gear equals points on the licence if you get caught!

There will be plenty of others who prefer the SV. I did love the relaxed thump of the v-twin, but the best sounds are to be enjoyed from about 10 metres behind the bike, which is not much use to the rider.

With Yamaha’s amazing 3.5 year 0% finance deal (which has just been extended), the Fazer will be more accessible to most people, and it’s a great bike for the money. Either way, you’re going to have a great bike that delivers lots and lots of grins.