Monthly Archives: October 2008

Halloween is here – time to tape up the letterbox again

Halloween. I’m not a fan. Kids running around begging for sweets (or money now), usually without proper parental supervision. Adults getting dressed up as all manner of bizarre things and going to parties. Not me. I shall be sat at home, with my letterbox firmly taped up (thanks to some kids who chucked eggs in once), resolutely refusing to answer the door. My kids will be safely tucked up in bed.

Most people just see Halloween as a bit of fun and have no idea what it’s actually about. Let me enlighten you…

Halloween stems from an ancient Celtic festival called Samhain. The Celts celebrated their new year on 1 November, and this day marked the end of summer and the harvest, and the beginning of winter – a time of year they associated with death. The Celts believed that on the eve of the new year, 31 October for them, that the boundary between the worlds of living and dead became blurred.  They even believed that ghosts of the dead returned to earth at this time, causing trouble and damaging crops. They believed that these otherworldly spirits made it easier for Druids to foretell the future.

The Celts built huge bonfires and sacrificed crops and even animals to their gods. They dressed up in costumes – usually animal heads and skins – and spent the evening telling each other’s fortunes.

Later, when the Romans came, two Roman festivals were combined with Samhain. The first was Feralia, a day towards the end of October when the Romans commemorated the passing of the dead. The second was a festival to honour Pomona, the Roman goddess of fruit and trees. Pomona’s symbol is the apple, and this is the likely root of “bobbing” for apples that is often practiced today on Halloween.

In the 9th century, Pope Boniface IV designated 1 November as All Saints’ Day – a time to honour saints and martyrs. The pope was likely trying to replace Samhain with a church-sanctioned holiday. This celebration was also called All-hallows or All-hallowmas which comes from the ancient English word Alholowmesse, meaning All Saints’ Day. The night before began to be called All-hallows Eve, and from that we get the modern term Halloween.

A couple of hundred years later, the church, presumably forgetting their righteous interlude of trying to replace the festival of the dead with a more holy venture, then designated 2 November as All Souls’ Day – a day to honour the dead. This was celebrated in much the same way as Samhain and included big bonfires, parades, and dressing up in costumes as saints, angels and devils.

What about modern day Halloween customs…?

The Pumpkin has become synonymous with Halloween. The Celts believed that the head was the most powerful part of the body, containing the spirit, so they used the head of the vegetable in their festival as a superstitious symbol. The name Jack O’Lantern traces back in Irish folklore to a greedy, gambling and hard-drinking old farmer called Stingy Jack. He is said to have tricked the Devil into climbing into a tree and then trapped him by carving a cross into the tree trunk. In revenge, the Devil supposedly cursed Jack, condemning him to forever wander the Earth at night with the only light he had: a candle in a carved out turnip. The pumpkin was used over a turnip in North America as it is easier to carve.

Trick or treating resembles the late medieval practice of “souling”, when poor people would go from door to door on Hallowmas (1 November), receiving food in return for prayers for the dead on All Souls Day (2 November). This practice was famously mentioned by Shakespeare in his comedy The Two Gentleman of Verona (1593), when Speed accuses his master of “puling [whining], like a beggar at Hallowmas”.

In Ireland, they play a game called Puicini, where a blindfolded person sits in front of a table where saucers are placed. The saucers are shuffled and the person chooses one by touching it. The contents of the saucer then determines the person’s life during the following year. A saucer with earth foretells death, water foretells emigration, a ring foretells marriage, and many more.

Unmarried women were frequently told that if they sat in a dark room on Halloween and gazed into a mirror, they would see the face of their future husband. Alternatively, they might see a skull, which foretells their death before they could marry.

So, in summary Halloween is intrinsically linked with pagan festivals and occultism.

The UK is full of agnostic people who have no belief in a spirit world, good or bad, and as such see Halloween as just a bit of fun. In African countries where occultism is far more prevalent, there are far fewer agnostic people – largely because they can see the very real effects of dabbling in the occult.

I find it a bit strange though that Halloween should be so widely practiced in the UK, which is nominally a Christian country. Occultism is not a Christian practice at all. In fact, to be Christian means to be Christ-like, or an imitator of Christ. Frankly, I don’t believe Jesus would have had anything to do with any of this nonsense. His teachings were perfectly explicit on what happens to people when they die.

So, as someone with a Christian faith, I choose not to get involved with Halloween in any shape or form. Everyone else can use their free will to do whatever they please, provided that does not extend to anti-social behaviour outside my front door, which is just as unacceptable tonight as it is on every other night of the year. Whatever your beliefs, it’s always worth knowing just what it is that you are celebrating, then you can make an informed choice rather than just going along with the crowd because the novelty toy industry wants you to.

Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand suspended by the BBC for making crank calls to Andrew Sachs

I’m pleased. Frankly, I’d rather vigorously shave my scrotum with a rusty cheese grater than endure even a second of Russell Brand on my television screen. That said, I do accept that he appeals to a certain type of person and that the BBC has to appeal to all sorts of licence payers, yada yada… however, there is no place in “comedy” for leaving obscene messages on a 78 year old man’s answer phone.

It doesn’t suprise me that Jonathan “one-joke” Ross was involved in the “gag”. I used to enjoy watching his chat show, but now it is nothing but filth and F-words. “Pushing the boundaries” or “edgy comedy” is probably how the BBC would describe. I’d prefer to stick with “offensive filth not worthy of air time”. Why has it become acceptable for the BBC to broadcast foul language? There’s no need for it (unless you’re Jonathan Ross and you need it for your punchlines), and I object to being forced to pay for the BBC to produce this rubbish. If the licence fee was optional, I’d opt to not pay it and not watch the BBC at all.

If the BBC want to broadcast content like this, then they will become answerable to every single licence payer. In this case, over 18,000 people have already complained. I will be adding myself to that number. Today, the BBC suspended Ross and Brand, and all their shows. Some are calling for them to lose their jobs – I think that’s possibly a little harsh given that the show was pre-recorded and the BBC editorial team had two days in which to cut the content from the show. It is the editorial team that should be sacked.

DV247 (Digital Village) – nice to find a company that cares about customer service

I posted previously on this page about a negative experience I’d had with dv247.com, which has recently been resolved thanks to the new MD taking the initiative to get in touch with me. It may have been a few years since I originally wrote my comments, but he took the opportunity to apologise and then made a very kind donation of some musical instruments to my son’s school.

Having been in business for many years myself I know only too well that it’s just not possible to please 100% of your customers, 100% of the time, no matter what you do. I fear on this occasion that I may have been one of the few customers that “fell through the cracks”, particularly considering that I didn’t receive any comments in the past three years from readers of my blog with negative comments about DV247 (despite a #2 ranking in Google for “dv247″), and given their eagerness to make things right, I think it’s only fair that I update this post.

Clearly, DV247.com is a company that cares about customer service, and that’s always nice to find.

The kids at Greenfylde School will enjoy the percussion instruments, so thank you to Paul and his team.

Ah the MOBO awards – let’s all enjoy a nice slice of racist pie

Another year, another racist awards ceremony. No doubt loads of people will shout me down here, but I have a simple question to ask: Does anyone object if I start the MOWO awards?

Whenever this argument comes up, the supporters of MOBO simply claim that the awards are open to all and that it is the music itself that was of black origin, not the performers. At the same time, they post blogs on their website about how great the British black music scene is and then fawn over a load of black artists.

How about the BBC’s digital radio stations…? BBC Asian Network? Would there be any objections if there was a BBC White Network, or even a BBC Black Network?

I can’t stand racism and this is racism. Racism is not something that only white people are capable of.

Some people would have you believe that all popular music is stemmed from black origin. It’s all based on blues they say. Maybe, but I don’t think one skin colour or race of people has the right to claim three chords and a pentatonic scale as being exclusively their own. Modern rock and pop stems from all sorts of sources and all sorts of influences. The Beatles hugely contributed to the landscape of modern music. Some of the best blues players are not black, and these men (Clapton, Moore, Gallagher et al) have taken the genre and added their own considerable influence to it.

Why can we not just have an awards ceremony based on the genre of music, not the skin colour of those that perform it?

LittleBigPlanet game delayed over Koran phrases in a background music track

I read in the news today that Sony have delayed the launch of LittleBigPlanet. I must confess that I had never heard of LittleBigPlanet before today, but I understand it’s an eagerly awaited title. What caught my attention was the reason for the delay. Read more »

What’s good about Goodmans?

My dad always taught me to appreciate quality, and I have lived by the maxim: buy cheap, buy twice. Ergo, I have not ever purchased any audio visual equipment with the brand name Goodmans on it. This caused me lots of aggro many years ago with an ex-girlfriend who entrusted me with some of her savings to go and buy a portable TV for her whilst she was at work. I ignored all the cheap stuff and bought a very nice little Philips set, much to the consternation of her parents who considered my purchase to be reckless and wasteful, when a Goodmans set could have been had for less. I have always stood by my decision, and now I have been vindicated!

I’ve just enjoyed a week in the Lake District, where I rented a cottage for our family holiday. Said cottage came complete with Goodmans TV set – one with a combi DVD player built in. How was it? “Utter festering crap” is the only words I can find to do it justice. The picture was lacklustre and the build quality looked woeful, but the real issue was the audio. Cheap and nasty audio components and speakers all contributed to completely unlistenable sound, no matter what setting I tried. Speech merged into background sounds and music into one big blob of indeterminate sound. Hopeless.

My wife once bought a Goodmans hi-fi (or lo-fi, depending on your viewpoint) and I chided her mercilessly for the purchasing choice. We weren’t married at the time. Had we been, I would have made her take it straight back for a refund. It was naturally the cheapest and nastiest sound system which murdered every song ever played through its woeful speakers.

So, what’s good about Goodmans? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Rubbish kit for people with no ears.