My wife has been fully supportive of my motorcycling from day one – she’s great like that. She didn’t bite my head off when I spent £2,500 of our savings on a bike, and then was quite happy for me to spend another £1,200 on a second bike (provided I sold my car). I don’t believe she sits at home worrying whilst I am out riding, at least if she does, she doesn’t tell me. She rode for a couple of years herself, and she is confident in my ability. We used to go two-up on her scooter. And she has been very much looking forward to riding pillion. However, such riding opportunities are rare due to our having two young sons.

Now that we have organised a baby sitter and are going for a ride this weekend (weather permitting), she suddenly started talking about making a will this morning and deciding who would have our kids if we snuffed it. This is perfectly sensible thinking, but I wonder if she would have been prompted to think about it if we were off in the car together this weekend?

The truth is, no matter how safe you think motorcycling is, there is always that nagging realisation in the back of your head to remind you that falling off is likely to hurt. A lot. Sometimes these doubts find their way into the front of your mind whilst riding, usually resulting in an immediate slackening of the right hand. Generally, however, when I’m riding I just enjoy myself.

I saw my grandad recently who is convinced that most motorcyclists are “tearaways” and that all vehicles should be limited to 70mph. There may be an element of truth in what he says, but it is certainly not true that most motorcyclist are “tearaways” and I don’t believe that riding over 70mph should define one as such. It’s all very well taking the 70mph is the limit of safety stance if you’re driving a Morris Minor, but on a modern sports bike, travelling at 70mph is well below the speed that the bike is designed to travel at safely. A bike can stop in far shorter distances than a car, and can safely travel at high speed too. Everything is relative though. Travelling at 120mph on a bike that can only do 125mph is not likely to be safe by virtue of the fact that you are travelling at the limits of the machine’s capability. Travelling at 120mph on a bike that can see north of 180mph, would be well within the limits of the bike’s capability.

The biggest problem at high speed is not usually the machine, it’s the reaction time of the rider. In fact, being branded as a “tearaway” has everything to do with rider skill and judgement, and nothing to do with an arbitrary speed limit. On a long straight dual carriageway, when no-one else is around, riding at higher speeds is not likely to result in imediate death.

The motorcycle is a design over 100 years old, and it works by virtue of its simple science. The wheels act as gyroscopes and provide the bike with complete stability. In normal riding, this perfect balance can only be broken by a loss of grip with the road. The bike does not need a rider to balance it. You see riders come off in Moto GP all the time, and the bike often keeps going straight on. Further stability is added by the gyroscopic action of the engine.

There is the possibility of mechanical failure resulting in rear wheel locking. A chain that breaks, or failed wheel bearings could cause some very scary moments. My GSX is having a full service at the moment, and my SV has just had one, and a new tyre, and it’s going for new chain and sprockets next week. I have always looked after my machinery, and if you don’t skimp on the essential maintenance, and do your safety checks before you ride every time, then you have nothing to fear. How many car drivers, perform a quick safety check before they set out? I always scan my tyres and check my brakes before each ride. The chain needs to be checked once per week, and the lights. I take this opportunity to crawl around the bike checking everything.

The real dangers to a motorcyclist’s life then are road surface and other road users. The speed travelled at only becomes an issue if it is far in excess of all other road users, or too fast for the road conditions. I certainly do not subscribe to the ridiculous government mantra: “speed kills”. Speed does not kill anybody – it’s coming to a sudden halt that does the damage.

I feel safe on the roads. I remain visible to other road users and I keep a protective “bubble” of space around me when I ride. When this bubble is invaded by others, I take action to restore it. I’ve done almost 4,000 miles of motorcycling this year and I haven’t had any really dangerous moments. There have been 3 occasions when I have had to take emergency action. The first was my own fault, I completely misjudged a bend and lost faith in the bike’s ability to get round corners. I managed to pull up safely and was mildly shaken, but the truth is that had I leaned it over more and given it some throttle, I would have flown around with no problems. The second was an emergency stop on a main road. The idiot in front of me almost missed his turnoff and stood on his brakes very suddenly. I skidded momentarily but kept it in control. The third occasion was a stupid woman with a dog on one of those extending leashes that should be banned. The dog ran out into the road on a housing estate to bark at me and my bike. I stopped dead in virtually no distance, proving the safety of motorcycle brakes, and resisted the urge to deliver a firm kick to the little terrier’s nose. The woman didn’t even apologise. Anyway, 3 moments when I needed to focus and deal with a situation. That’s about the same number I would expect over the same distance in a car.

I think the real problem here is that most of the people spouting off about the “dangers” of motorcycling are people who have never ridden a bike, and probably can’t drive a car that well either. It’s not until you ride for yourself on a quality machine that you realise how safe it actually is. Those that do lose their lives whilst motorcycling, are either really unlucky or have failed to exercise sound judgment when riding their machine.

When riding a motorcycle you are closer to the machine, and the elements, so you are far more conscious of your state of safety. Most car drivers are completely oblivious – cocooned in a metal shell, singing along to their favourite tunes or talking on their mobile. Who is more dangerous?

I’ve been really enjoying riding my SV650S around, it is a fantastic and engaging bike, but for a big chap like me, it doesn’t offer much in the way of long-journey comfort. I had been thinking about selling it and buying a bike more suited to touring, but I came upon a better solution whilst browsing eBay Motors earlier today. There staring me in the face was an auction for a mint 1993 GSX1100F in purple and silver. Taxed, MOTed, and only 5986 miles on the clock!! Surely too good to be true? If it all panned out, I could keep the SV and have a classic sports tourer on the side.

It turned out the bike was a part-ex to clear being offered by a dealer in Exeter, and a good look at the larger photos on their website revealed what was looking to be a genuine bargain of a motorcycle with a ticket price of £1395. I jumped in the car…

The bike was every bit as good as looked in the photos, with just a couple of very minor blemishes. Apart from those it looks showroom fresh, and the engine is sweet as a nut. One previous owner, a brand new rear tyre, and a fully working electric windscreen. Could it get any better? Yes, actually, because I got it for £1,250, and then Bennetts charged me a measly £85 to add it to my existing insurance policy.

So, to sum up: A 15 year old, mint sports tourer, in my favourite colours, with ridiculously low miles for £1,250. I still can’t believe it.

Some would say I’m mad moving up to a 1127cc bike after only 3 months (and 2,500 miles) riding experience since passing my test. I have to be honest: I did question my own sanity. This is a big bike and quite a step up from the SV. In fact, it packs 136BHP and a top speed pushing 160MPH. Despite this, the ride home was enjoyable, effortless and not in the least frightening. Suzuki basically took a GSX-R engine, re-bored it and re-tuned it to make more low-end and mid-range grunt. It has fairly tall gearing too, so it is perfectly manageable. I did open it up a little a couple of times, and I briefly met the snarling monster of death that threatens to snuff out your existence if you forget who’s boss, but this is a touring bike. I didn’t buy it to race along bendy B-roads – I’ll take the SV over the GSX anyday for some rapid twisties – I bought it for distance riding, and that, it will do perfectly. I’m also 30, well experienced on the road generally, and I have good self-control over my right hand. I think I’ll be able to ride this bike and keep breathing.

Despite being a good 90kg heavier than the SV, the GSX1100F is reasonably easy to manage due to its lower seat and low centre of gravity. It’s only at low speeds doing tight maneuvres or wheeling the bike around that you notice the weight. On the road it’s smooth like you’d expect a bike of this low mileage to be – it fairly floats along. Whereas my SV650S is a very involving ride, I felt a little more like a passenger on the GSX. The riding position is more upright, as you would expect from a tourer, and the windscreen when fully extended, really does keep the worst of the wind and rain off you, which is nice given the appalling conditions I rode home in. It doesn’t drop into the corners like a lighter bike will, but once you have it cranked over, it holds its line and gives real confidence.

The big inline four delivers smooth power even from low rev ranges. You can quite happily just roll along in 5th gear with minimal throttle input, or open it up for amazing roll-on pickup and some nice lazy overtakes. Stopping is not quite so breathtaking as accelerating, with the braking technology showing its age a little. It certainly doesn’t feel as sharp as my more modern SV, but that’s not to say the brakes are in any way poor – there’s plenty of stopping power there too.

Really, I think this just proves that despite what the industry tells you there really is no reason to not consider an older, low-mileage machine. Mine has clearly been well cared for and has lived a somewhat sheltered existence. The previous owner managed a ridiculous average of 32 miles per month during the 15 years or so that he owned it. I put double that on it today, and I shall have no qualms about adding on the miles. Fact is, that this bike will still be worth what I paid for it even with double the mileage and a couple more years under its wheels.

Tonight I sit smugly on my sofa with the sense of self-satisfaction that can only come from the safe knowledge that I have just found an absolute bargain!